The first time I tried to explain QMDJ to someone who was not a student, I made every mistake in the book. I started with the history, lost them in the first two minutes, and by the time I reached the nine palaces they were nodding politely and looking for an exit. That was not a failure of QMDJ. That was a failure of teaching, and it taught me something I now tell every graduate who asks about sharing this art with others: knowing the system and teaching the system are two completely different skills.
First teaching gigs, whether they are informal introductions to friends, a workshop at a community center, or a guest spot in someone else’s class, are where you discover the gap between what you know and what you can communicate. That gap is normal. Every practitioner encounters it. The question is not whether you will hit it, but how you handle it when you do.
Why Teaching Is Different from Reading
When you read a chart, you interact with the chart and the client. The chart is a fixed structure. The client brings a question. You bring your interpretation. The flow is relatively contained. When you teach, the dynamic inverts. You are now the one responsible for making a complex system comprehensible to someone who has no framework for it yet, and that requires a skill set that chart reading does not develop.
The first difference is pacing. In a reading, you deliver your interpretation at the speed that feels natural to you. In teaching, the pace is set by the learner. If you explain the nine palaces in three minutes and your listener’s eyes have glazed over, you are teaching at your speed, not theirs. Teaching requires reading the listener the way you read a chart, watching for the signals that tell you whether your message is landing or bouncing.
The second difference is sequencing. When you read a chart, the structure is already laid out. The palaces are where they are. When you teach, you decide the order. Do you start with the palaces or the doors? Do you explain the stems before the stars? The order matters enormously, and the order that worked for you when you learned may not be the order that works for someone else.
Start Small, Start Safe
Your first teaching opportunity should be low-stakes. Not a paid workshop. Not a conference presentation. A conversation with a friend who is curious, a lunch-and-learn at your office, a casual talk at a community gathering. These settings let you practice the skill of explanation without the pressure of a paying audience, and they give you honest feedback that polished settings do not.
A friend will tell you “you lost me at the stems.” A paying audience will smile and never come back. You want the friend’s feedback, because it is specific and immediate, and specificity is what you need to improve. Vague “that was interesting” is useless. “I understood the palaces but you lost me when you started talking about the 8 Gods” is a roadmap for your next attempt.
The Fifteen-Minute Rule
Here is a practical exercise I give to graduates who want to start teaching. Prepare a fifteen-minute explanation of QMDJ for a complete beginner. Time yourself. Fifteen minutes, not thirty, not an hour. The constraint forces you to make decisions about what to include and what to leave out, and those decisions are the core skill of teaching.
What do you cover in fifteen minutes? Not everything. You cover one thing well. The nine palaces as a grid. Or the concept of an hour chart. Or one door and what it means. One concept, explained clearly, with a concrete example, is worth more than ten concepts listed rapidly. Your listener will remember one thing from a fifteen-minute talk. Choose that thing deliberately.
The Mistake Every First-Time Teacher Makes
I have watched dozens of graduates attempt their first teaching gig, and the same mistake appears almost every time. They try to teach everything they know. The Apprentice program gave them a complete system, and they feel obligated to convey that completeness in their first teaching opportunity. The result is a fire hose of information that leaves the listener overwhelmed and unable to retain anything.
Teaching is not about what you know. It is about what your listener can absorb. A master teacher does not dump their entire knowledge base on a student. They select one piece, deliver it in a way that lands, check that it landed, and then move to the next piece. The selection is the art. A teacher who has studied for ten years and teaches one concept clearly in fifteen minutes is more effective than a teacher who has studied for ten years and tries to convey all of it in an hour.
I learned this the hard way. My first formal teaching attempt was a two-hour workshop that tried to cover casting, palaces, doors, stars, stems, and 8 Gods. I prepared forty slides. I delivered them at a pace that made sense to me, because I knew all the material. Half the audience left at the break. The ones who stayed told me afterward that they enjoyed it but could not remember most of it. Of course they could not. I had given them a textbook in two hours and expected them to learn it.
Teaching as a Learning Tool
Here is something that surprised me about teaching: it made me a better reader. Preparing to explain QMDJ to beginners forced me to articulate things I had been doing intuitively. When a student asks “why do you read the door before the star?”, you have to produce an answer that goes beyond “that is how I was taught.” You have to understand the reasoning at a level that casual practice never demands.
This is why I encourage graduates to teach even if they have no ambition to become full-time teachers. The act of preparing an explanation deepens your own understanding. You discover the gaps in your knowledge when you try to fill someone else’s. Concepts you thought you understood suddenly become fuzzy when you try to articulate them, and that fuzziness is valuable information about where your own understanding needs work.
A graduate who started a monthly free introductory session told me: “I learn more preparing for each session than I did in the last three months of solo practice. Every question from the audience shows me something I thought I knew but actually did not.” That is the hidden gift of teaching. It is a mirror that reflects your own understanding back to you with a clarity that solo practice cannot match.
When to Start Teaching
Not immediately. I recommend at least six months of practice after certification before you attempt any formal teaching. You need time to internalize what you learned, encounter real charts, make your own mistakes, and develop the confidence that comes from having been wrong and recovered. Teaching before you have that foundation is risky, because you may transmit your own misunderstandings to people who trust you.
Six months is not an arbitrary number. It is roughly the point where your own readings have enough volume that you can illustrate concepts with real examples from your practice. “Let me tell you about a chart I read last month” is far more powerful than “the textbook says the Open Door means expansion.” Real examples anchor abstract concepts in lived experience, and your listener remembers them long after the theory fades.
After six months, start with the fifteen-minute exercise. Do it three or four times with different friends or small groups. Each time, pay attention to what landed and what did not. Revise your explanation. Try again. By the fourth or fifth attempt, you will have developed a teaching instinct that no course can give you, because it is built from your own examples, your own language, and your own discoveries about what makes this art click for a beginner.
The Ethical Line
I want to be clear about something that should not need saying but does. Teaching QMDJ is not the same as certifying practitioners. A graduate of the Apprentice program can introduce QMDJ to newcomers, explain the basics, and share their experience. They cannot certify, authorize, or imply that their students are qualified practitioners. That role belongs to the formal training program and its trainers.
This is not a territorial claim. It is an ethical boundary that protects the public. Someone who attends a two-hour introductory talk with a recent graduate is not ready to read charts for paying clients, and implying otherwise is irresponsible. Teach to share. Teach to learn. Do not teach to certify, because the stakes are real, and the people who would act on a certification you are not authorized to give could make decisions based on unqualified readings.
Teaching Formats That Work for Beginners
After you have done a few informal sessions and refined your fifteen-minute explanation, you might want to try a more structured format. Here are three that I have seen work well for graduates who are new to teaching.
The first is the introductory talk. Thirty to forty-five minutes, covering one concept with depth and a few real examples. This is the natural extension of your fifteen-minute exercise, and it gives you room to breathe, answer questions, and adjust on the fly. Keep it to one concept. Do not expand to two just because you have more time. Use the extra time for examples, questions, and discussion.
The second is the hands-on workshop. Ninety minutes, where you guide participants through casting their first chart. This format is more engaging because people are doing, rather than merely listening, but it requires more preparation and more confidence. You need to handle the chaos of six people looking at six different charts and asking six different questions. It is demanding, but it is also the format where people have the most fun, because they are touching the system for the first time.
The third is the case study evening. You present one real chart from your practice, walk through your reading process, and discuss the outcome. This format is less about teaching mechanics and more about showing what a reading looks like from the inside. It is captivating for audiences because it is real, and real stories teach more than abstract frameworks ever do. Just be careful to anonymize the details so no client is identifiable.
Handling the Know-It-All in the Room
In every teaching setting, you will occasionally encounter someone who already knows something about QMDJ and wants to demonstrate that knowledge. They interrupt with corrections, cite sources you have not read, and generally make the session about themselves rather than the topic.
Handle this with grace but firmness. Acknowledge their knowledge publicly, then redirect to the group. “That is a great point, and there is a deeper layer there for people who want to study further. For now, I want to make sure everyone here has the foundation, so let me continue with the basic framework.” Most people accept this redirection because it is respectful. The few who do not are not your audience, and you should not let them hijack the session.
I had a session once where a participant kept interrupting to cite classical commentaries. After the third interruption, I said “You clearly have deep knowledge of the source texts, and I would love to continue that conversation after the session. Right now, I have six people who are seeing their first QMDJ chart, and I want to give them a clean experience.” He came up to me afterward, apologized, and turned out to be a genuinely nice person who had simply been excited. Handling it with respect preserved the session and the relationship.
The Difference Between Teaching and Preaching
This is a sensitive topic, but it needs to be addressed. QMDJ is not a belief system. It is a strategic framework. When you teach it, you are not asking people to believe in anything. You are showing them a system for reading patterns and making decisions. The moment your teaching crosses from “here is how this system works” into “you should trust this system with your important decisions,” you have shifted from teaching to evangelizing, and that shift is both ethically problematic and practically counterproductive.
Let your students discover the value of QMDJ through their own experience. Show them the mechanics. Walk them through a chart. Let them see how the pieces fit together. Then let them decide for themselves whether this is a tool they want to use. A student who comes to QMDJ through their own curiosity is a student who will practice with genuine engagement. A student who was persuaded that QMDJ is powerful is a student who is chasing results rather than understanding, and that is a fragile foundation.
I have seen practitioners who teach with an almost religious fervor, and their students tend to fall into two camps: a few who become devoted followers, and many who are alienated by the intensity and never come back. The teachers I respect most teach with calm confidence. They present the system, share their experience, answer questions honestly, and let the work speak for itself. That style attracts thoughtful students who stay, and it builds a practice that is sustainable over decades.
The First Class You Ever Teach
Your first class will be messy. I guarantee it. Someone will ask a question about a palace you have not thought about in months. Another person will want to cast a chart for a situation that does not fit neatly into any category you know. A third will spend ten minutes telling you about their cousin who is really into feng shui and whether that is the same thing. This is normal. Teaching is not the controlled environment of your practice journal. It is live, unpredictable, and humbling.
The mistake I see first-time teachers make is trying to cover too much. They prepare a syllabus that would fill a weekend and try to squeeze it into ninety minutes. The result is a rushed, shallow session where nobody actually learns anything. A better approach is to pick one thing and teach it well. One door. One star. One casting method. Go deep on that single topic, let people ask questions, let them get hands-on with it. Depth in one area builds confidence, and confidence is what brings people back for the next session.
After your first class, sit down and write notes on what worked and what did not. Which explanations landed? Which ones confused people? Where did you lose the room? This debrief is more valuable than the class itself, because it tells you what to adjust before the next one. Every teacher I know who improved quickly did this religiously after every session for the first year.
Pricing Your First Sessions
This is the question I get asked most often by graduates who want to start teaching. The answer depends on your context, but let me give you a framework. For your first few sessions, charge nothing or charge a nominal fee that covers your costs. You are learning to teach, and your students are helping you learn. Treat it as a mutual exchange rather than a transaction.
Once you have taught three or four sessions and you feel confident in your delivery, start charging a real fee. The fee should reflect your preparation time, your expertise, and the local market. But here is the thing: a fee also signals value. Free classes attract people who are curious but not committed. Paid classes attract people who are invested. The quality of your teaching improves when your students are invested, because they ask better questions and do the exercises more seriously.
FAQ
Can I charge for teaching introductory QMDJ sessions?
You can, but I recommend doing your first several sessions for free. The early sessions are your training ground, and charging for them creates pressure that interferes with learning. Once you have refined your explanation and consistently deliver value, a modest fee is reasonable for your time and preparation.
What if someone asks a question I cannot answer?
Say “I do not know, and I will find out.” That answer builds more trust than a improvised response that might be wrong. Write the question down, research it, and follow up. Your honesty about the limits of your knowledge is more valuable to a learner than a confident but incorrect answer.
How do I know if I am ready to teach?
If you have been practicing for at least six months, can explain one QMDJ concept clearly in fifteen minutes, and have a set of real chart examples from your own practice, you are ready to start with small, informal sessions. Readiness comes from preparation, not from a feeling. Prepare, practice on friends, and the readiness will follow.
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.